2007 - 2021

In Memorium Lehman

SATURDAY marks the tenth anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the giant US investment bank, and the onset of the Great Bank Crash. Lehman Brothers defaulted on September 15, 2008 on a staggering $613bn of debt obligations, the biggest bankruptcy in American history. Result: a sudden seizure of bank liquidity around the world, a general collapse in share prices, and a global recession. But who killed Lehman Brothers and started the rot? You’ll be surprised by the answer: Alistair Darling.

It was inevitable the media would celebrate the tenth anniversary of the financial crisis by giving air time to the guilty. But I was surprised by the supreme lack of self-consciousness with which our Alistair trumpeted his involvement (as UK Chancellor) with the Lehman debacle. Up he piped on the Today programme to explain that it was he, Alistair Darling, who had rejected a last-minute plea from Hank Paulson, his US opposite number, to agree a saving takeover of Lehman Brothers by Barclays, the big UK bank. Result: Lehman’s collapse the next day and global financial turmoil. Thanks Alistair.

Barclays was desperate to acquire Lehman and had put a deal in place, beating off a rival bid from Bank of America. The idea was to transform Barclays into a global player in investment banking. To close the deal quickly, Barclays needed authorisation from UK regulators and the British Government to wave a vote of its own shareholders.

Cue a phone call from Hank Paulson to Alistair Darling, at home in Edinburgh.

But Alistair had been briefed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the clod-hoping, incompetent bureaucracy set up by Gordon Brown to manage the City of London on behalf of the City of London. This was run by Brown’s crony, ex-banker friends with vested interests coming out of their ears. Predictably, FSA had failed to notice the emerging financial crisis or the run on Northern Rock. Now in a panic, FSA advised Alistair to have nothing to do with Barclays’ takeover of Lehman lest the UK Treasury have to bail it out.

There’s a happy ending – for Barclays’ shareholders. After Lehman went down, Barclays snapped up most of their $50bn of supposedly toxic assets for a mere $1.7bn. To celebrate, Bob Diamond, head of Barclays’ investment division, had “God Save the Queen” played on the trading floor at Lehman HQ in New York. Those Lehman assets turn out not to be so radioactive after all. Barclays made a fortune on what has been called “the deal of the decade”. So did others from the bits of Lehman that Barclays did not acquire.

Of course, had Darling allowed Barclays to acquire Lehman in a more orderly fashion, there would still have been a global financial crisis. But its catastrophic consequences most likely would have been mitigated – especially for poor Americans with subprime mortgages. Not to mention the 1.2 million folk who lost their job in the UK between 2007 and 2010. As for Baron Darling of Roulanish, he is now a member of the board of directors of the giant US investment bank Morgan Stanley. According to that bank’s accounts, non-employee board members are paid between $85,000 and $115,000 – plus $250,000 in shares.


This week saw the publication of the latest Scottish employment figures, for the quarter ending in July. These showed the jobless total down by 6,000 compared to the three months to June, but also suggested that the overall number of Scots aged 16-64 who are in employment has dropped by a worrying 32,000 compared with this time last year. Cue a typically po-faced statement from Tory Secretary of State David Mundell: “Scotland’s performance is worsening” and blaming it on the SNP Government rather than Brexit or the Chancellor.

However, the official monthly employment stats are highly unreliable and frequently nonsensical because they are compiled using a very dubious sampling method. Politicians (including ScotGov) should ca’canny in responding to them. Monthly variations in the figures are often incomprehensively huge, before reverting to trend with the next set of statistics.

Consider: in last month’s data set, the number of Scots in work aged 16- 64 is recorded as down by 3,000, comparing April-June 2017 to April-June 2018. Yet only four weeks later, the latest stats claim a drop of 32,000 in employment, comparing May-July 2017 to May-July 2018. Which means, taken at face value, there was a heck of a jump in folk suddenly exiting the Scottish labour market in July 2018, just as fields needed harvesting and hotels needed extra staff. Pull the other leg.

In fact, taken over a long period, the employment data is more consistent with the Scottish labour market performing strongly. Youth unemployment is lower compared with the UK average, and more women are in work. But in fairness, David Mundell has helped boost Scottish employment. According to a parliamentary answer in July, the Scotland Office now employs 16 communications officers to put out the Secretary of State’s propaganda press releases.

Comments (4)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Malcolm McDonald says:

    If France controlled Belgium, would Belgians believe the stats produced on Belgium’s economic and employment statistics?

    If England controlled Ireland, would the Irish believe the stats produced on Ireland’s economic an employment statistics?

    England controls Scotland, who but am idiot who believe the stats produced on Scotland’s economic and employment statistics?

    If you place somoene else in charge of your affairs and close your eyes and ears in the belief that they may be screwing you, but that”s the way it’s always been and you have no confidence in your own ability – you have Scotland in a union nutshell. This view is used by those that controll Scotland from London. It’s used by them to reinforce the inferiority belief through the media and their place-men / women continuously casting doubt on your ability and potential.

    The example of the above is amplified via brexit. France, Belgium and Ireland all have more say on how Scotland brexits than Scotland does. In other words, France, Belgium and Ireland have more influence on Scotland”s economic and employment future at this poin in time than Scotland does. But, ultimately England controls Scotland future plus the fate and wellbeing of our people. And in this case, England means the tory elite manipulating anything and everything to their advantage.

    As for darling and brown, they are fantasists and incompetents without shame who are trying to rewrite history to absorb themselves of blame for the crash that they created in the banking system in London. A crash hat spread like wild fire. A wild fire that brought about austerity, food banks and English nationalism, let’s not forget the lies and falsehoods of darling and brown. “I saved the world” – aye right!

    Lastly, with all the limitations and flaws of devolution, how would brown and darling fiared if they had been in charge at Holyrood? What a scary thought! Scotland must take control of its own affairs, the alternative is we are ruled from London by English right wing tories who merely view our land and people as ewsources to be exploited for their benefit.

  2. carlqceol says:

    In memorium? You guys need a proofreader!

  3. SleepingDog says:

    “started the rot”? Or perhaps the failure of an investment bank is a welcome opportunity to peer into a corrupt system inherently destabilized by greed and incompetence, rather than have this covered up by a buy-out?

    Could this article as easily be filed under “Self-satire” or “Great Men of History” categories as “Economics”?

  4. Jamsie says:

    Ah damned lies!
    There are some like Malcolm MacDonald who think the statistics produced by the Scottish “government” for the Scottish “government” on the economy (I take it he means GERS) and employment are not to be believed.
    A wee bit like you suggest Mr Kerevan.
    But I would have thought that the comparison with previously produced stats would need to compare apples with apples.
    Rather than completely rewriting the methodology and losing comparison why don’t they just produce another set of stats showing the actualite?
    Maybe because they don’t want people to know that under the U.K. we do ok if not better than we would if independent?
    Now that Derek Mckay is also responsible for the economy as well as finance do you agree he has his finger on the pulse?
    Were you happy with his conclusions identified in his article in the Sunday Herald on 7.6.18.
    Do you agree that the GCR is key to our economic strategy?
    Does it adequately analyse the performance of the Scottish economy?
    Should we be surprised that the minister has accepted the report and its contents without question?
    Everyone knows the Scottish economy has performed poorly in recent years under SNP governance particularly the GDP/GVA or growth rate has been significantly below U.K. and EU averages. The GCR dies not seem to address this.
    It has been suggested the Scottish “government” have been hiding behind Brexit as the reason for this but this does not explain why Scotland has done worse that the U.K. economically.
    All a tad mendacious as the most likely cause of Scotland falling behind both the UK and the EU was the recession in the North Sea oil and gas following the collapse in prices globally.
    Some people think wee Nicola should apologise for misleading the country on the £30bn claim made as the price was already on the downward slope.
    The other problems lie clearly in the poor quality of work by Scottish Enterprise, it’s Highland counterpart and of course the Scottish Futures Trust.
    Radical change is required to all these organisations to endure the Scottish taxpayer sees a return to growth levels which are comparable to both the UK and the EU.
    So on the back of all that what is the economic case for independence?
    And why have the Scottish “government” been lying all this time about their complete and utter failure.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.