2007 - 2021

Silencing Authors

One of the major themes of this years Edinburgh Book Festival is ‘Freedom’. It’s a critical question of the day in a country where bookshops are attacked, fascists deified and human rights trampled on.

It does sound like the issues of writers and authors who have had problems with their visas being refused to attend the Book Festival, has now been resolved. But they do enter a Brexit Britain convulsed in a Hostile Environment, culturally illiterate, cutting itself off, and building walls against dissent and thinking. The book ban and the burka ban are part of the same story.

The racism spewing out of our former Foreign Secretary’s mouth is unexceptional. The realities of being tied to a state turning in on itself against the world, normalising racism and enthral to dark forces is becoming clear, and had even threatened to penetrate the leafy tents of Charlotte Square.

Nick Barley had said:

“It is Kafkaesque. One was told he had too much money and it looked suspicious for a short trip. Another was told she didn’t have enough, so she transferred £500 into the account – and then was told that £500 looked suspicious. It shouldn’t be the case that thousands of pounds should be spent to fulfil a legitimate visa request. I believe this is happening to many arts organisations around the country, and we need to find a way around it.”

Barley called the situation humiliating, adding: “One author had to give his birth certificate, marriage certificate, his daughter’s birth certificate and then go for biometric testing. He wanted to back out at that point because he couldn’t bear it, but we asked him to continue. Our relationship with authors is being damaged because the system is completely unfit for purpose. They’ve jumped through hoops – to have their applications refused.”

Writer Val McDermid asked: “Could we find a way to better diminish our cultural standing in the world?”

It seems that, after a lot of work the issues have been ironed out.

Nick Barley from the Book Festival updated the situation this morning:

“We are enormously grateful for the support of politicians from both the Scottish and UK Governments, senior members of the British Council and Ambassadors from countries across the Middle East and Africa who have helped us to ensure that a dozen authors facing visa challenges are able to attend the Festival.  This has obviously taken an extraordinary amount of time and work on behalf of a relatively small number of authors.”

If the incident is resolved it also gives us a brief glimpse into the daily reality for many people travelling to Britain on entirely legitimate business. None of this environment would be possible without a coterie of apologists and enablers slavishly and unquestionably backing statements that only a year ago would have been throughout disgraceful in public discourse:

“Je ne suis pas Boris” says Daisley, in the Spectator.

“There’s something inherently illiberal about trying to gag him” says Fraser Nelson, in the Spectator.

“It’s illiberal to gag Johnson” (or something) says Brendan O’Neill in the Spectator.

Sharp-eyed readers might have spotted a trend here.

We’re told that a  “permit-free festival visitor visa is available to artists appearing at 45 approved cultural events, including Womad and the Edinburgh Fringe, which means they do not require a certificate of sponsorship and only have to show bank balances for three months. However, the book festival is not on the list.”

The question arises why is the Edinburgh Book Festival not on this list?

But it also raises a recurring theme of exceptionalism.

Shreyas Royal, who has been dubbed as Britain’s “greatest chess prospect in a generation” is just one in a long line of ‘talents’ used to  distract from the mainstreaming of deportation, ejection of asylum seekers and the brutality of Britain’s detention regime. People shouldn’t be allowed to stay because they are good at chess, a good athlete, speak Gaelic, or have some unique talent. It’s a weird postcode lottery of a system egged-on by a media complicit in framing a racist narrative about immigration. To that end the issue is not about ‘art’ or literary festivals – but about human rights and the state we’re in.

If the writers ban had remained in place, the writer Alastair McIntosh had argued that this was: “the British state sabotaging the internationalist culture of the Scottish nation.” He promised: “As a Birlinn Books speaker in this year’s book festival to make a short statement to guests from the stage in protest “.

This is a welcome declaration. But it’s also a hilarious irony in that Hugh Andrew, managing director of Birlinn, is also a key player behind the Scottish Business UK group and a keen supporter of Scotland in Union. In 2013 Andrew issued a warning about the impact of independence on the publishing industry in Scotland. Andrew said Scottish writers faced being seen as “foreign” in the rest of the UK in the event of a Yes vote.

Instead the Britain Andrew backed is one where the Home Office threaten and obstruct people coming to Scotland to take part in a cultural event.

The Book Festival have (rightly) refused to name the writers involved. Let’s hope that the festival goes ahead without state interference.






Comments (6)

Leave a Reply to Liz Summerfield Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Liz Summerfield says:

    I’m surprised to see Bella Caledonia referring to the UK as ‘our country’. We are 4 nations – no?

    1. Do you mean in the sentence: “It’s a critical question of the day in a country where bookshops are attacked, fascists deified and human rights trampled on”?

      1. florian albert says:

        Which fascists are deified ? By whom are they deified ?

  2. SleepingDog says:

    Presumably, in the UK, a book on the history of British censorship would itself be censored or silenced in some way or other. In these days of e-books, it really is noticeable which out-of-print books don’t make it to e-book formats, although self-publishing is now easier than because of the same digital technologies. It should be possible to analyse patterns with artificial intelligence, find some interesting gaps.

    Mind you, I suppose it is technically feasible for e-books to be retroactively censored. Perhaps paper has its advantages.

    I was disappointed when attending an Edinburgh Book Festival event a few years ago on the ‘edgier’ sort of comics to find very little time devoted to political themes. Although I was able to pick up a copy of volume 1 of Royal Descent.

  3. Gordon McShean says:

    Scottish publishers (as well as some nationalist) now have found how to suppress Scottish stories that didn’t suiting them! In 1953, as a 16 year-old teenager who’d routinely assisted SNP National Secretary Robert Curran at the Glasgow SNP Offices, I joined with others to raid an armoury and dumped guns that Robert had feared might be used against demonstrators. One of our group was arrested … and subsequent reports of his handling were minimal, anyway; in the Glasgow Herald it was hardly worth reading. Robert got told us to hide. He then went off to the US (where he would remain for some years before returning to Edinburgh, to taking a lesser post with the SNP). I escaped to Europe, where I hoped I’d be able to continue promoting the cause by writing; I never believed that I’d be exiled for life … or that publishers would act to hold this story unworthy.
    I suppose I should feel fortunately. I got work at an US Army post in Germany, and I was pleased when these guys liked my work so much they let me move to America, where I got academic posts. But I was still interested in contributing into the Scottish cause (an interest I’ve held live-long). I tried to maintain contacts (thinking the guns story would be worthy) but I could not get interest with newspapers or book publishers. I wrote my first book In the US , OPERATION NEW ZEALAND, telling of suffering my specialist 1966 heart surgery (the US edition was called BUM TICKER!). I subsequently book the was RUNNING A MESSAGE PARLOR, 1977, telling about my work in promoting free speech in America. During this (when I moved to NZ), I’d been gathering together my Scottish memoir, TARTAN TERRORIST. But by 2009 I’d begun to realize Scottish publishers didn’t want to use a ‘radical’ story! So, finally – believed no Scottish publisher now would want to examine my draft, I contacted in Trafford in Canada and was pleased when they accepted it Now I’ve got my photo on the cover of the 429p volume – and the book is also distributed in the US. But I do feel it would be nice if it could be available from Scottish sources! It is apparent that my Scottish story – and stories from other Scots too – are likely to find some tough going now, until such time us Scotland is free!

  4. SleepingDog says:

    Another category of silencing comes from authors (or would-be authors) within the establishment who want to publish memoirs or perhaps whistleblowing exposés. For example, in her book The London Cage: The Secret History of London’s World War II Interrogation Centre, Helen Fry describes how Colonel Alexander Scotland’s own (heavily?) self-censored memoirs about his time commanding the facility was itself suppressed by intelligence services MI5 and MI6. The UK official secrets regime appears to indoctrinate civil servants into a lifetime code of silence, which will be interestingly tested if British subjects become Scottish citizens.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.