2007 - 2022

Caught in a Storm

It’s a quintessentially British idea: ‘caught in a downpour without a brolly’ [“Britain is caught in a storm. We shall need to make the best of things”].

The very odd ‘These Islands’ project has burst onto the scene with a series of subtly-placed articles in major newspapers across the land, each tweeted proudly out by the organisation as if they had just stumbled across them at the newsagents (“Good god Hargreaves another great piece in the Times this morning!” – “Yes and we’re surprisingly well received in the Telegraph…” etc)

But occasionally the choreographed media coverage goes a little awry, as it seems to have done with the Guardian’s fantastically nostalgic Bute-columnist, Ian Jack.

Before we look at Jack’s well-intended piece, it’s worth glancing (perhaps only briefly) at Nigel Biggar’s piece on the website. Biggar we’re told is “Oxford University’s regius professor of moral and pastoral theology” – as if we didn’t know that!

Anyway he’s just the sort of grassroots, finger-on-the-pulse homey that is going to transform the Better Together campaign’s urban base the next time (and they clearly think there’s going to be a next time). The purpose of These Islands is, according to the  Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology: “To remedy “the faltering inarticulacy of unionists in explaining what the United Kingdom is good for”.

Yes, well, quite.

Ian Jack explains:

“So what is the United Kingdom good for? According to Biggar, three things: as a bulwark against Russia’s threat to liberal democracy; as an example of multinational solidarity (the depth of which “the European Union can still only dream”); and as a prominent upholder of a humane international order – “a post-imperial habit” that for the world’s sake the UK needed to keep. All of these things will remain true “whether or not Brexit comes to pass”, but all will be diminished if the UK breaks apart.”

Talk about a hot take! By a bulwark against Russia’s threat to liberal democracy presumably he means our famously misfiring Trident missiles and our famously coke-free navy vessels standing valiantly by to defend our food banks from being flooded with cheap wodka and tins of Borscht.

And, aren’t you just brimming-over with “multinational solidarity (the depth of which “the European Union can still only dream”. Hmm. Me too.

As for the “post-imperial habit” that for the world’s sake the UK needed to keep” – I just have no idea whatsoever what that’s supposed to mean.

But you have just got to love the sustained fantastic delusion of the sentence: “All of these things will remain true “whether or not Brexit comes to pass”.

To be honest, if the Brexit omnishambles rumbles into your home town causing the sort of economic devastation that’s been outlined by independent think-tanks, I can’t really imagine the “multinational solidarity” holding up against the primal wail of “We didn’t vote for this you stupid fuckers” cascading down the country.

Over at the New Statesman the usually reliable Chris Deerins veers dangerously off-message:

“There are plenty of people south of the border who have had enough of the Jocks banging on about independence. I’ve lost count of the number of Brexiteers who have said to me that, given a straight choice, they’d rather lose Scotland than give up Brexit. Lord knows what the Northern Irish reaction is going to be once the full impact on its relationship with the Republic is felt. None of this gives me any pleasure, but it would be a lie to say I can’t feel my internal chemistry beginning to change. I won’t be the only one. The Britain I argued for in 2014 is ceasing to exist, has made a monkey of me, is regenerating into an unattractively spivvy character – and it doesn’t seem to care, really.”

Ah, yeah, Northern Ireland. Shit.

Anyway, as a sort of exercise in Astroturfing for the Autumn Years These Island shows great promise, even if the desperate need for Credibility and Status does seem to be pursued with a bit too much vigour.

We’re told that:

“They have assembled a 40-member advisory council rich in good names, including Lady O’Neill, Prof Margaret MacMillan and Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield.”

I was left a little bit cold by this announcement, though I did begin to wonder where Nympsfield was.

If this all seems a bit weary and downbeat, it is.

Jack admits solemnly: “Three years on, I would find it much harder to grieve for the end of Britain. Brexit and a strident English nationalism have changed everything.”

Hey! You’re supposed to be the warm-up act fella!

He ends rousingly: “In these circumstances, the thinktank These Islands may find its true purpose in encouraging us to make the best of things: a pep talk to a weary couple holding on to the wreckage.”

Jesus H Christ – it’s not exactly the Promised Land is it?

Still if the No campaign has any doubt about its name for the second referendum Jack has at least stumbled upon it. Cast aside the magnificent “UK:OK” – bring on “We shall need to make the best of things”.



We are holding our annual fundraising appeal to try and raise £35,000 to continue and develop Bella Caledonia. If you enjoy this site we need your support to continue.

We can’t continue without more of our readers supporting us.

The money will go towards developing Bella as a platform for writers, filmmakers and artists, something that no-one else is doing in Scotland.

Please go here and make a donation. 



Comments (8)

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Stewart Bremner says:

    This from Deerin’s piece is marvellous: ‘[Tom] Holland insists These Islands is not “a Panglossian exercise, nor an argument for preserving the status quo in aspic”.’ I’m imagining their (unpaid, honest!) volunteers telling people that at the Kirkgate on a Saturday morning. Oh what larks!

    1. Yes there does seem to be some dissent in the ranks. No aspic. None.

  2. Wul says:

    I searched just now on Google for “these islands”. The result comes up: “These Islands-CEREAL”

    Is that a typo? Should it read “EAT YOUR CEREAL” ?

  3. James Mills says:

    I look forward to the massed ranks of the ”These Islands” org. coming to Glasgow to invigorate us Jocks and to settle the hash of those dastardly separatists , and being serenaded down Buchanan Street by the chap who met the Labour cohort on their day trip during the referendum .
    Suggestions as to the theme song for such an occasion – the Imperial March from Star Wars has been done !
    What about ”There’ll always be an England ” ?

  4. Stan Reeves says:

    TV historian Dan Snow says his brother-in-law, the seventh Duke of Westminster, is coping well despite the sad death of his father, the sixth duke.

    Dan Snow is married to Lady Edwina, sister of Hugh Grosvenor, seventh Duke of Westminster, who took on the title and the Grosvenor empire when his dad passed away on August 9, 2016.The 7th Duke of Westminster, 25-year-old Hugh Grosvenor, is now the heir to a legacy worth more than £9bn.
    Thanks to a series of trusts, which are thought to date to the death of the 2nd Duke in 1953, Hugh and his three sisters will avoid having to pay the 40% levy ordinary families are faced with when parents die.

  5. Graeme Purves says:

    Curiously, the biographical note for Brian Wilson omits to mention that he was Tony Blair’s Special Envoy to Iraq.

    1. Good point. I’ll raise it with them.

      1. Graeme Purves says:

        I remember him being interviewed by the BBC about plans for the reconstruction of that unfortunate country. Sadly, he didn’t stick around to deliver.

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.