2007 - 2022

To Govern ‘As If’

I won’t be the the only person to say this, on this site and elsewhere, but the Programme for Government set out yesterday by the First Minister is far and away the most progressive and ambitious that the chamber has ever heard. An awful lot of it makes welcome reading to an awful lot of people involved in the broader Yes coalition over the last few years. From a primary to tertiary strategy on education, to a positive and manufacturing and export based vision for the economy – all underpinned by a publicly owned and run investment bank – from an unashamedly optimistic, joined up programme going from infrastructure to green targets to taxation and welfare, this PFG represents nothing less than an aspiration to transform this small country.

That this is being done in the doomed, minimal expectation atmosphere of Brexit is to dissociate Scotland from the UK without even mentioning the Constitution, and it left opposition parties floundering, responding to the speech that they were expecting, not the speech they got. Within the narrow confines of the Holyrood Bubble and it’s attendant commentariat, it was something of a game-changer.

We’ve had a few months now since the election of denial and wound licking. And the document produced yesterday is of course still ambition rather than achievement.

The question of how it will play in the wider world of Scotland, let alone the wider world beyond will probably come down to what the “story” is. And that may comer down to nuance and feeling as much as the very firmly holistic and grounded “culture of government” that the PRG sets out. It unashamedly looks to a Scottish State to coordinate and shape a holistic vision of what a country can be. In the contemporary context, this is almost thrilling in its heresy. It is also entirely, unashamedly, optimistically European.

It is a Programme for Devolved Government with the ambition we’d look for from Independence. In fact, in many ways, it is far MORE ambitious than was the White Paper produced for the 2014 Referendum Campaign.

“It unashamedly looks to a Scottish State to coordinate and shape a holistic vision of what a country can be. In the contemporary context, this is almost thrilling in its heresy. It is also entirely, unashamedly, optimistically European.”

And this, to me, is a sure sign that the Sturgeon Government has moved on. In retrospect, the perpetuation of the “Indy Mood” BEYOND September 2014 and through 2015 and 16 (until the brexit vote, in fact) , that sustained and promoted the fortunes not just of the SNP, but of the rather more numinous “mood of optimism” in our political culture, was bound to come to cultural if not arithmetical grief in the unexpected election of 2017. The wave had been stoked up and kept going by a mixture of stubborn ineptiotude and arrogance in the Cameron government, and charisma in the person of Nicola Sturgeon…and the wave was bound to crash at sometime.

But what was clear yesterday was that the twin realities “external” to the aforementioned Holyrood Bubble of the increased uncertainty of Brexit on the one hand and the mercurial rise of Corbyn on the other may well have taken the immediate constitutional campaign of “IndyRef 2” off the front burner, but they have also opened a space for a far more specific and identifiable “left” programme of government by the SNP.

Thanks to an astonishngly positive response to the new circumstances that seems to be very much led from the front, the SNP government have hit the ground running in a New Normality that I, at least, was slow to see coming.

But make no mistake. This degree of radicalism in government is only possible if the political priority of building a referendum coalition which includes, (as Salmond so cautiously did) a very Not-Radical proportion of the Scottish Electorate that is simply arithmetically essential to a Yes vote, has been decisively dropped. Ironically, we and Nicola Sturgeon may be being afforded this vision of Scotland’s future only because The Independence Campaign – as we have understood it up until now – is off the agenda.

The “Indy Moment” of 2011-2016 is over. We are in a new phase now. There are things happening over which we have control, as evidenced by the leaking yesterday of a Home Office paper on future UK Immigration policy as suicidal as it is illiberal, as oppressive as it is impractical. The contrast of confidence that was displayed yesterday between Edinburgh and London is absolutely stark. . For my money, it is exactly what needed to be done to positively change the story we need to tell ourselves as a culture. The way to prove to ourselves our fitness to govern ourselves…is to do it.



*We really need your support to develop though and we’d like to ask you to support us by donating to us here.

We’ve got big plans to launch our new site, to launch new publishing and events projects, and to extend our platform of writers – but all of this needs your support.

Bella Caledonia remains free (and ad-free) and takes me hundreds of hours a month to research, write, commission and edit. If you value what I do, please consider supporting with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing. GoCardless to set up a small monthly donation to support independent journalism in Scotland.


Go here to subscribe for free and get each Bella article sent to your email
Go here to follow us on Twitter @bellacaledonia
Go here to follow us on Instagram
Go here to join our Facebook Group
Go here to follow us on Spotify
Go here to write for us

Comments (9)

Leave a Reply to Alf Baird Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Crubag says:

    “may well have taken the immediate constitutional campaign of “IndyRef 2” off the front burner”

    My reading of it is that it is no longer even in the kitchen. Once the ambition to rerun the indy referendum before Brexit was dropped, then future UK/eEU relations become so opaque that it made no sense to keep it hovering around.

    I also get the sense that the Growth Commission report did not meet with SNP approval – that the recent speech on industry was the filleted, domestic part, but that more ambitious proposals on fiscal or monetary policy were left for another day, and probably another leader.

    1. Graeme Purves says:

      Your ouija board is clearly well tuned. Let us know if you detect any manifestations of ectoplasm.

      1. Crubag says:

        More fun reading the programme for government and seeing whose face is in and whose isn’t. There’s a reshuffle coming…

        (but if you want a contrast, compare this year’s and last’s – Brexit is baked into this one)

        1. Graeme Purves says:

          You are a veritable Mystic Meg!

  2. Eleanor Ferguson says:

    I felt really positive about the announcement and felt that it was a case of the Scottish Government acting as if we were already independent, which is great because the Westminster goverment is becoming more of an embarrassment at every turn.
    As for independence being off the table for now,it always was as far as I’m concerned as Nicola Sturgeon made it clear early on that it was an option once we had a better idea of what Brexit is going to mean. The fact that the opposition parties misrepresented that to diguise their own lack of policies might have fooled some people this time,but I really think we’ll be begging for the chance to escape the madness of Brexit in the not too distant future. So the SNP doesn’t need to mention again until then, which will wrong foot the opposition when they can’t bang on about them not doing the day job because of their “obsession” with a second referendum.

  3. Graeme McCormick says:

    The Opposition will continue to go on about another Indy ref because that’s all they have to speak about.

    I look upon the Programme for Government being the preparation for Independence .

    We shouldn’t be shy about Independence if we include really practical and radical initiatives along the way.

    The more our government takes controls and mitigates improves and replaceUK reserved matters as it and we can do the ties which bind us will fall apart quickly.

    There is much we can do to appeal to the Haves in Scotland as it is essential that a broad consensus for Independence is established to put the next vote beyond doubt.

  4. e.j. churchill says:

    “Program for Home Rule”

  5. Alf Baird says:

    Aye, Bills for this and that, but the reality is that more or less the same budget (i.e. 90%+) will be going to the same hands as usual.

    The only Bill missing (again) is a ‘Dissolution of Union (Scotland) Bill’, this despite an (alleged) independence supporting democratically elected majority of MSPs (and MPs) in Scotland.

    1. Alf Baird says:

      Considering the current debate in the HoC, perhaps an ‘The United Kingdom Union (Withdrawal) Bill’ would be more apt for Holyrood and Scotland’s (alleged) independence supporting majorities of MSPs and MPs to bring forward? That would give Scotland’s 1000+ colonial overlords (i.e. England’s MP’s and its unelected Lordships) something else to discuss in addition to their European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. Such a Bill could include plans for a further plebiscite to ask Scottish people their views. Are Scotland’s politicians simply afraid to use their democratic majorities? Do we always have to wait to see what crumbs are falling off Westminster’s table, to see what next part of Scotland is easily dispensable?

Help keep our journalism independent

We don’t take any advertising, we don’t hide behind a pay wall and we don’t keep harassing you for crowd-funding. We’re entirely dependent on our readers to support us.

Subscribe to regular bella in your inbox

Don’t miss a single article. Enter your email address on our subscribe page by clicking the button below. It is completely free and you can easily unsubscribe at any time.